art of the hospital, his offence would
MC
light
one, and according to
English Law would be punishable
for manslaughter.
As
The same rule would
apply also to the removal of the dangerously
ill, if their death
was
hastened thereby.
Petitioners have read this pro-
clamation with a good deal of dismay.
The
command not to
remove the dying
out of the hospital they acknowledge
to be excellent, but petitioners
have
removed the dying
out of the
hospital, though they have now and
then removed them into other rooms.
The
reason
is that
this Worship's orders to separate the two, the living should be removed from the dying. Petitioners
would humbly submit that the better plan is to remove the dying from the living. For instance if there
are several patients
in a
room,
and
one of them becomes dangerously
ill, therefore, all the other patients who
are
not
dangerously
ill are
removed, perhaps
and
some of them will be made dangerously ill
by the removal, and then another removal will have to take place,
and thus
another removal will involve
further difficulties.
Petitioners therefore will find it
very difficult
to
carry
out this rule,
and
they fear that when this Worship next makes his inspection, there will
art of the hospital, his offence would
MC
light
one, and according to
English Law world be punishable
mareslaughter.
As
The same rule would
apply also to the removal of the dangoravly
ill, if their death
was
hastened cherely.
Pititioners have read this pro-
clamation with a good deal of dismay
The
command not to
I not to remas the dying
art of the hospital they acknowledge
to be excellent, but petitioners
have
removed she
diping
out of the
hospital, though they have now and
shew removed them into other rooms.
are,
that
this Worship's orders to separate the two, the living should be remard from the dying. Petitioners
would humbly subout that the better. plan is to remove the dying from the living. For instance if itere
several patients
atients in
because
are
roon,
are
and
of them becomes dangerously
ill, therefore, all the oitier patients who
aro
not da
dangerously
removed, perhaps
and
ill are
کر مر گیا
to be
tive of those
latts will be made dangerously ill
by the removal, and then another removal will have to take place,
and thus
another.
are removal will involve
Petitioners therefore will find it
very difficult
to
carry
art this rule,
and
they fear that when this Worship next makes his inspection, there will
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.